A couple of years ago, we retired our wet-mops.
Both field experience and numerous studies indicate that microfiber ("flat") damp mops use less
solution, need less chemical in that solution, and leave a cleaner floor than traditional string mops.
Because microfiber mops lay down less solution than string mops, less solution is used. Given better scrubbing action and better absorption of the microfiber, we also found that we could "ratchet down" the chemical used in the solution, substituting a neutral cleaner for an alkaline one, or even plain water for a neutral cleaner. So less chemical used, less water, and fewer trips to the slop sink
Worker productivity improved: the microfiber mops cover a wider area, and hence move faster; get under furniture and along edges more efficiently; are lighter, reducing worker fatigue; and don't slop solution up onto baseboards and furniture legs.
Floors look better: less streaking and water marking, and less soil left behind.
Finally, a study conducted by the University of California at Davis Medical Center demonstrates superior pathogen removal - a bacteria culture shows a 30% removal using string mops, versus a 99% removal using microfiber.
So - less expense for me, an easier job for my people, a sharper looking and healthier facility for my client. A rare win-win situation.
Posted
01-03-2010 7:58 PM
by
Bob Croft